Research and Relationship Compatibility

단딘-루랑 C, 로랑 R, 달라라 I, 투팡스 B, 샤익스 R (2019)

인간의 MHC 분해 교배에 대한 게놈 증거

Proceedings of the Royal Society B

This study examined whether genetic differences were associated with partner choice across several populations. The findings varied by region, leaving social and cultural context as important factors.

Birnbaum GE, Zholtack K, Mizrahi M & Ein-Dor T (2019)

The Bitter Pill: 경구 피임제의 중단은 의 매력을 향상시킵니다.대체 동료

Evolutionary Psychological Science 5, 276–285

Some studies have examined whether hormonal contraception is associated with changes in partner preference. Results remain mixed, and the research does not establish compatibility between two people.

Wedekind C (2019)

Research on scent pleasantness, intensity, and genetic differences

Proc. R. Soc. B 285:20172714

This reanalysis explored how scent pleasantness and intensity related to genetic differences in the study sample. It described a more nuanced pattern than a direct link between genes and attraction.

Henningsson S et al. (2017)

Research on genetic differences and partner choice

Translational Psychiatry 7:e1118

This review considered whether genetic variation was associated with partner choice across modern populations. It found no single pattern that can determine attraction or relationship outcomes.

Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2014)

우정과 자연선택

PNAS 111(suppl 3): 10796–10801

Friends share genetic similarity comparable to that of fourth cousins. Suggests social bonds form along subtle biological gradients, not only shared environment - relevant to how romantic compatibility extends beyond MHC.

Garver-Apgar CE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Miller RD, Olp JJ (2006)

주요 조직 적합성 복합체 대립유전자, 성적 반응성 및 연인 관계에서의 불충실함

Psychological Science 17:830-835

One study reported associations between genetic similarity and survey responses about sexual interest and fidelity. An association in one sample does not predict how a relationship will develop.

Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Carter V, Petrie M (2008)

인간의 MHC 관련 냄새 선호도와 경구 피임약의 사용

Proc. R. Soc. B 275:2715-2722

This study explored whether oral contraceptive use was associated with scent preference. The reported effect remains debated and should not be treated as a measure of compatibility.

Wedekind C, Furi S (1997)

Research on scent preferences and genetic diversity

Proc. R. Soc. B 264:1471-1479

Participants rated scent samples from genetically typed donors. The findings suggested that overall genetic diversity may matter more than any specific pair of markers, but the study did not predict relationship success.

Wu K, Chen C, Moyzis RK, Nuno M, Yu Z and Greenberger E (2018)

피부 깊이 이상의 매력: 아시아계 미국인 스피드 데이팅에서의 주요 조직 적합성 복합체(MHC) 기반 매력

Evolution and Human Behavior. 39(4):447-456.

In one speed-dating study, some genetic differences were associated with second-date decisions for women but not men. Personality and other profile information also mattered, so the findings do not provide a stand-alone matching rule.

Burger D, Meuwly C, Marti E, Sieme H, Oberthür M, Janda J, Meinecke-Tillmann S and Wedekind C (2017)

Research on scent and mate preferences in horses

Theriogenology. 89:318-323.

This animal study examined genetic differences, hormone levels, and mating interest in horses. The patterns changed with reproductive phase and cannot be assumed to describe human partner choice.

Sherlock JM, Sidari MJ, Harris EA, Barlow FK, Zietsch BP (2016)

Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: disentangling traits and behaviours .

Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 6:31562.

This study explored whether partner traits were associated with reported orgasm frequency. It found associations with several social and sensory traits but did not establish a single cause.

Kromer J, Hummel T, Pietrowski D, Giani AS, Sauter J, Ehninger G, Schmidt AH, Croy I (2016)

Research on genetic differences, partnership, and sexual satisfaction

Sci Rep. 6:32550.

The study examined whether immune-gene differences were associated with partner choice and sexual satisfaction. It reported possible scent-related associations, not a deterministic relationship.

Wlodarski R. and Dunbar RIM. (2015)

Research on romantic kissing and mate desirability

Evol Psychol. ; 12(1): 178–199.

This study examined how reported kissing ability affected ratings of potential partners. Visual information and relationship context also influenced responses, which points to several factors rather than one measure of desirability.

Burger D, Dolivo G, Marti E, Sieme H and Wedekind C (2015)

Research on genetic type and reproductive signals in horses

Proc. R. Soc. B 282:20150407

This animal study examined whether genetic differences were associated with hormone levels and sperm count in stallions. Its findings concern horses and do not establish a human matchmaking outcome.

Laurent R and Chaix R (2012)

인간의 MHC 의존적 짝 선택: HapMap 유럽계 미국인 데이터셋의 유전체 패턴이 이 가설을 지지하는 이유

BioEssays. 34(4):267-71.

.

Lie HC, Simmons LH and Rhodes G (2010)

Research on genetic diversity and mate preferences in humans

Evolution and Human Behavior 31:8–58.

이 연구는 유전적 요인, 특히 주요 조직 적합성 복합체(MHC)가 인간의 짝 선호에 미치는 영향을 탐구하며, 남성이 단기 및 장기 짝짓기 맥락에서 MHC가 다른 여성들을 선호하는 경향이 있음을 발견했습니다. 또한 유전적 다양성이 다양한 짝짓기 맥락에서 남성과 여성의 파트너 선호에 영향을 미친다는 것을 보여주어, 인간의 짝 선택에서 MHC의 중요한 역할을 지지하며 이러한 선호가 자손의 유전적 다양성을 향상시키기 위해 기능할 수 있음을 제안합니다.

Lie HC, Rhodes G and Simmons LH (2010)

Research on genetic diversity and mating success

Animal Behaviour. 79, 4:903-909

One study reported an association between genetic diversity and the number of sexual partners among women in its sample, with no comparable finding among men. It did not establish a causal effect or predict compatibility.

Chaix R, Cao C, and Donnelly P (2008)

Is human mate choice linked to genetic differences?

PLOS Genetics, 4 (9)

The study found different patterns across the populations it examined. That variation suggests genetic associations are context-dependent and cannot determine partner choice.

Schwensow N, Fietz J, Dausmann K, Sommer S (2008)

Research on genetic diversity and mate choice in a pair-living primate

Evol Ecol. (22) 617-636

This primate study examined genetic diversity, social pairing, and parentage. It found several competing patterns, which cannot be carried over directly to human relationships.

Wedekind C (2007)

Research on genetic differences and descriptions of body odour

Evolutionary Psychology.5(2): 330-343

Professional perfumers described body-odour samples from genetically typed participants. The study reported some associations, but it did not establish that scent can determine partner choice.

Wedekind C (2006)

Is body-odour intensity linked to genetic differences?

Evolutionary Psychology. 4:85-94

This study examined whether genetic similarity was associated with how women rated the intensity and pleasantness of men's body odour. The results were limited to the study sample and do not predict attraction.

Pause BM, Krauel K, Schrader C, Sojka B, Westphal E, Mu¨ller-Ruchholtz W, and Ferstl R. (2006)

인간의 뇌는 동일 성별 및 이성 관계에서 화학 감각적으로 전달된 HLA-클래스 I 유사성을 감지하는 장치입니다.

Proc. R. Soc. B (2006) 273, 471–478 doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3342

This study explored whether people respond differently to body odours associated with genetic similarity. It proposed a possible role in social signalling but did not establish a matchmaking effect.

Martins Y, Preti G, Crabtree CR, Runyan T, Vainius AA and Wysocki CJ (2005)

Research on body-odour preferences, gender, and sexual orientation

Psychological Science, 16(9) 694-702

Participants rated body-odour samples across gender and sexual-orientation groups. The observed preferences varied by group and do not amount to a compatibility measure.

Horton R, Wilming L, Rand V, Lovering RC, Bruford EA, Khodiyar VK, Lush MJ, Povey S, Talbot CC Jr, Wright MW, Wain HM, Trowsdale J, Ziegler A, Beck S (2004)

Gene map of the extended human MHC.

Nat Rev Genet 5(12):889-899

This study mapped a complex region of the human genome involved in immune function. It provides biological background but does not establish a matchmaking outcome.

Jacob S, McClitock MK, Zelano B and Ober C (2002)

Research on inherited genetic differences and scent preference

Nature Genetics, 30:175

This study demonstrates that women can discern differences in male body odor influenced by a single variance in HLA (human MHC) allele, with a woman's capacity to distinguish and prefer certain odors notably being based on HLA alleles inherited from her father and not her mother; this suggests that paternally inherited HLA-associated odors influence odor preference and might function as social cues, even despite a milieu of potential odors derived from a variety of genetic and cultural factors..

Milinski M and Wedekind C (2001)

Research on genetic differences and perfume preference

Behavioural Ecology 12(2):140-149

The study found associations between genetic types and perfume ratings for personal use, while ratings for a partner's scent were largely unrelated. It does not support using perfume preference as a compatibility measure.

Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F And Paepke AJ (1995)

MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans.

Proc.R.Soc.Lond.B. 260:245-249.

One study reported that body-odour preferences were associated with genetic differences and contraceptive use. The finding was context-specific and does not determine attraction.

Jokiniemi A, Magris M, Ritari J, Kuusipalo L, Lundgren T, Partanen J and Kekäläinen J (2020)

수정 후 유전적 매칭: 자궁경부 점액이 인간 정자 기능에 미치는 HLA 의존적 영향

Proc. R. Soc. B 287:20201682

* 발견된 바에 따르면 정자 생존력은 파트너의 HLA 비유사성과 관련이 있으며, 이는 자궁경부 점액이 면역유전적으로 호환되는 파트너 간의 후속 생식세포 융합을 선택적으로 촉진할 수 있음을 나타냅니다.

Mosaad YM, Abdel-Dayem Y, El-Deek BS and El-Sherbini SM (2011)

이집트 여성에서 HLA-E *0101 동형접합성과 반복 유산 간의 연관성

Scand J Immunol. 2011 Aug;74(2):205-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02559.x.

Mosaad et al. found an increased frequency of homozygosity for HLA-E*0101 in Egyptian women with recurrent miscarriage.

Mora-Sánchez A, Aguilar-Salvador D, Nowak I (2019)

게임세포 매칭 플랫폼을 향하여: 면역유전학과 인공지능을 사용하여 반복 유산을 예측하기

NPJ Digit Med Mar 7;2:12.

* 재발성 유산(RM)의 예측을 위해 성공적인 임신 또는 RM의 병력이 있는 커플의 HLA 하플로타입을 분석하여 유전적 위험 계산을 제안했습니다.

Meuleman T, Lashley LE, Dekkers OM, van Lith J, Claas FH and Bloemenkamp KW (2015)

재발성 유산에서 HLA 연관성과 HLA 공유: 체계적 검토 및 메타 분석

Hum Immunol. May;76(5):362-73.

* 41개의 연구에 대한 메타 분석을 수행하였으며, HLA-B 공유와 HLA-DR 공유가 모두 RM 발생과 관련이 있음을 보여주었습니다.

Shankarkumar U, Pawar A, Gaonkar P, Parasannavar D, Salvi V, and Ghosh K (2008)

인도에서의 특발성 반복 자연유산 환자에서 HLA 대립유전자 연관성

J Hum Reprod Sci. 2008 Jan;1(1):19-24.

* 보고된 세계 RSA 환자들과 비교할 때 HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, 및 HLA-DRB1에서 대립유전자의 차별적 연관성을 확인했습니다.

Ober C (1999)

인간 고립체에서 HLA, 생식력 및 짝 선택에 대한 연구

Hum Reprod Update 5(2):103-107.

* HLA 유전자형에서 개별 대립유전자 및 HLA 해플로타입의 유사성이 Hutterite 커플 간의 태아 손실 위험 증가의 지표로서의 관계를 설명합니다.

Ober C, Hyslop T, Elias S, Weitkamp LR, Hauck WW (1998)

인간 백혈구 항원 일치와 태아 손실: 10년 전향적 연구 결과

Human Reproduction, Volume 13, Issue 1, Jan 1998, Pages 33-38

* HLA 항원에 대해 일치하는 후터라이트 커플 사이에서 태아 손실률 증가를 보여주는 10년 연구 결과

Ober., Steck., Ven., Billstrand., Messer., Kwak., Beaman., Beer (1993)

재발성 자연유산을 겪은 커플의 유산된 태아와 만삭 아기의 MHC 클래스 II 적합성

Journal of Reproductive Immunology, Volume 25, Issue 3, December 1993, Pages 195-207

* HLA-DQA1 대립유전자를 일치시키는 후터라이트 커플들 사이에서 재발성 자연유산의 비율이 증가함을 보여주었습니다.

Lok C (2012)

How personality frameworks are used in career development

Nature, 488: 545-547

The article describes how self-assessed personality frameworks may help people reflect on communication, leadership, and teamwork. It does not establish relationship compatibility.

Keirsey, D (2006)

A book about temperament and personality types

Promethius Nemesis Book Co., Del Mar, CA.

This book uses a self-assessed questionnaire to group people into personality and temperament types. It offers a vocabulary for reflection, not proof that two people are compatible.

Moutafi J, Furnham A, and Crump J (2003)

Research on demographic, personality, and intelligence measures

European Journal of Personality, 17:79-94

...

Myers IB, McCaulley MH, Quenk NL and Hammer AL (1998)

MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator .

Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, Vol. 3.

MBTI® 세 번째 판 매뉴얼은 이마스-브리그스 유형 지표® 도구의 개발, 적용 및 해석에 대한 종합적인 가이드로 작용합니다. 이 도구의 이론, 신뢰성 및 유효성에 대한 자세한 정보를 제공하고, 이마스-브리그스 유형 지표가 식별하는 16 가지 성격 유형에 대한 통찰력을 제공하며, 심리학적 유형의 선두주자인 이자벨 브리그스 마이어스, 메리 H. McCaulley, 노에미 L. Quenk 및 앨런 L. 해머가 저술한 것입니다.

Myers IB, McCaulley MH and Most R (1985)

매뉴얼, 마이어스-브릭스 유형 지표의 개발 및 사용에 대한 가이드.

컨설팅 심리학자 출판사.

The 1985 edition, 'Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator,' introduces and elucidates the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI®), designed to render C. G. Jung's psychological type theory comprehensible and applicable in daily life, underlining the principle that behavioral variations, while seemingly sporadic, are consistently orderly, deriving from intrinsic differences in individuals’ preferred use of perception and judgment.

Myers IB (1962)

매뉴얼, 마이어스-브릭스 유형 지표의 개발 및 사용에 대한 가이드.

Consulting Psychologists Press .

The 1962 manual for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator provides comprehensive insights and guidelines for implementing C. Jung’s theory of psychological types, asserting that behavioral variations are systematic and consistent due to basic perceptual and judgmental preferences, aiming to apply these preferences through self-reports to ascertain individual psychological types, thereby enabling the practical application and research into their effects on reactions, motivations, values, and capabilities.

Jung CG (1923)

심리적 유형: 또는 개별화의 심리학

Oxford, England: Harcourt, Brace .

This book presents a theory that groups personality differences by preferences in perception and judgment. It is historical context, not proof of compatibility.